Normally, I’m not much for the news, but this wikileaks “scandal” has got me pretty curious about the future of net neutrality. I fully support net neutrality and wish it could be so. Unfortunately, no matter how many petitions, no matter how many people speak up, the governments seems (lately) like they just don’t give a shit.
For those who’ve been living under a rock for the past few months, Wikileaks is a not-for-profit organizations whose sole purpose is to archive verified and accurate confidential documents to no end. They’ve gone as far as cloning their site (mirroring) world-wide into nearly 500 [or more] different locations. Seeing as it’s the internet and all, I honestly see no problem with what they’re doing. Sure, hosting Government documents throughout the internet could but hazardous, but whomever submitted the content should take that blame.
Just as an example to this ridiculous issue, imagine you run a rehab center of some sort. Your sole purpose is to make sure that no one abuses their habits. Then one day you decide to throw into the “herd” a big ole sack of contraband. Just a gigantic supply of anti-rehabilitating resources. Then, you realize that the patients are taking from the bag, ALL of the patients. The place is a catastrophe and then out of pure ignorance you blame the patients’ abusiveness on them. Telling them things like, “Why are you in a rehab center if you’re just going to use again?” Afterward, you kick all the patients out on their heads as well as all the employees. Sell the building to a bank and go home.
That’s pretty much exactly what’s going on here. Some dip-shit leaked confidential information to the INTERNET and the government is pissed that they can’t take it back. It’s as if they posted a video of themselves doing something awfully embarrassing and then getting upset because people are watching it. Threatening to take it away after it’s been copied a thousand times over in less than a second is just retarded.
Just to even more exemplify their threatening, they have currently disallowed ANYONE to make purchases / donate using a Mastercard or VISA. I can still buy Kevin Trudeau’s book on Amazon, but I can’t donate to Wikileaks. What’s with that? Is Donating to this place a threat to national security? Just because they are very good journalists and use their noggins to verify truths, I can’t send them $5 using a pre-paid VISA/MasterCARD much less a debit/credit card. This is a perfect example of net neutrality being diminished and I just wonder how long it will be until the Internet is no longer the open public place that we’ve grown to know and love.
Although what has been done is wrong, I do not support Wikileaks’ reaction to it by “hacking” both Mastercard and VISA’s websites.
-Sources
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2010/12/08/wikileaks-mirror-site-in-montreal.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11935539
http://www.datacell.com/news.php
http://www.rlslog.net/mastercard-com-hacked-by-wikileaks-supporters/












